Sunday, May 27, 2012 Saturday, May 26, 2012
fishingboatproceeds:

ellyintheskywithdiamonds:

So I went on goodreads to rate a book I just finished and I see this. 

I’d like to thank my corporate overlords at Penguin for this very attractive advertising campaign on goodreads.
I’m obsessed with goodreads because writers have never before really known much about their readers, or even about readers’ responses to their books. (Like, I know that most of the people who choose to write me like my books, but that’s obviously a self-selecting bunch. I also know a lot about what nerdfighters think of my books, but the vast majority of people who read my books do not know that I make videos on the Internet.)
Goodreads’ user base is so broad (The Fault in Our Stars has been rated almost 27,000 times) that it gives you a much better snapshot of the collective response to a novel than anything that came before. 
This kind of data can help us to understand—really for the first time—what people actually like reading, instead of just what they like buying and/or checking out from the library. (For instance, way more people have bought Twilight than TFiOS, but on average, readers prefer TFiOS to Twilight. In the future, we’ll be able to learn even more interesting stuff, like which of the two readers of both TFiOS and Twilight preferred.)
Obviously, writing novels isn’t and should never be driven by market research. But one of the oldest questions in publishing is whether books succeed on their merits or whether they mostly succeed because they have a lot of marketing money behind them (to pay for goodreads ads, for example). Goodreads can answer that question pretty effectively, because marketing may make people buy a book, but it will never make them like a book.

fishingboatproceeds:

ellyintheskywithdiamonds:

So I went on goodreads to rate a book I just finished and I see this. 

I’d like to thank my corporate overlords at Penguin for this very attractive advertising campaign on goodreads.

I’m obsessed with goodreads because writers have never before really known much about their readers, or even about readers’ responses to their books. (Like, I know that most of the people who choose to write me like my books, but that’s obviously a self-selecting bunch. I also know a lot about what nerdfighters think of my books, but the vast majority of people who read my books do not know that I make videos on the Internet.)

Goodreads’ user base is so broad (The Fault in Our Stars has been rated almost 27,000 times) that it gives you a much better snapshot of the collective response to a novel than anything that came before. 

This kind of data can help us to understand—really for the first time—what people actually like reading, instead of just what they like buying and/or checking out from the library. (For instance, way more people have bought Twilight than TFiOS, but on average, readers prefer TFiOS to Twilight. In the future, we’ll be able to learn even more interesting stuff, like which of the two readers of both TFiOS and Twilight preferred.)

Obviously, writing novels isn’t and should never be driven by market research. But one of the oldest questions in publishing is whether books succeed on their merits or whether they mostly succeed because they have a lot of marketing money behind them (to pay for goodreads ads, for example). Goodreads can answer that question pretty effectively, because marketing may make people buy a book, but it will never make them like a book.

Friday, May 25, 2012
‎If it’s bad, I’ll hate it because it’s bad. If it’s good, I’ll hate it all the more because I’ll be jealous of it. Never trust another writer. Midnight in Paris (via twinfools)
Thursday, May 24, 2012

hells-butterfly:

Lovebirds. Enough said

(Source: notienedesperdicio)

Wednesday, May 23, 2012
An exclamation point is like laughing at your own joke. F. Scott Fitzgerald! (via rulesformyunbornson)
Tuesday, May 22, 2012
[Flash 9 is required to listen to audio.]

rulesformyunbornson:

REQUIRED LISTENING: Tommy James and The Shondells, “I Think We’re Alone Now”

Friday, May 18, 2012 Thursday, May 17, 2012
fishingboatproceeds:

83% of American households have combined incomes under $100,000.
(But this points to something much more interesting, which is that almost all of us feel like we are middle class. Do you think that you’re middle class? I certainly do. I remember in high school, my European History teacher asked us to raise our hands if we considered ourselves middle class, and every single person in class raised his or her hand except for this one guy, who was the heir to a department store fortune. I laughed at the time, but in retrospect he was one of very few people who answered honestly. If you’re in that top 25%, meaning that you have two parents who work and who both earn more than $50,000 a year, you are much wealthier than most American families. Like, this guy comes off as a total brat, but most people in his position probably have the exact same experience.)

fishingboatproceeds:

83% of American households have combined incomes under $100,000.

(But this points to something much more interesting, which is that almost all of us feel like we are middle class. Do you think that you’re middle class? I certainly do. I remember in high school, my European History teacher asked us to raise our hands if we considered ourselves middle class, and every single person in class raised his or her hand except for this one guy, who was the heir to a department store fortune. I laughed at the time, but in retrospect he was one of very few people who answered honestly. If you’re in that top 25%, meaning that you have two parents who work and who both earn more than $50,000 a year, you are much wealthier than most American families. Like, this guy comes off as a total brat, but most people in his position probably have the exact same experience.)

Wednesday, May 16, 2012

(Source: jonsn)

Tuesday, May 15, 2012